課程名稱 |
修辭與寫作:由語言學入手 RHETORIC, WRITING AND LINGUISTICS |
開課學期 |
111-2 |
授課對象 |
文學院 語言學研究所 |
授課教師 |
蘇以文 |
課號 |
LING5417 |
課程識別碼 |
142 U1020 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
2.0 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
選修 |
上課時間 |
星期二7,8,9(14:20~17:20) |
上課地點 |
樂學館304 |
備註 |
14:10開始上課。歡迎大學部同學修習。 總人數上限:12人 |
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
This course aims to equip students with fundamental knowledge and skills concerning academic English writing and writing consultation from the perspective of linguistics. This course includes two hours of lecture plus one hour of group discussion. Topics to be covered include common rhetorical patterns, paragraph/essay development, grammar functionality, peer editing/review and essential techniques of writing consultation. |
課程目標 |
By the end of the course, students are expected to
● Develop the ability to think, analyze, integrate and innovate in academic English;
● Understand basic concepts of English academic writing;
● Be familiar with basic skills of writing consultation;
● Apply the knowledge to their composition and critique of academic writing;
● Evaluate and improve writing of their own and that by their peers. |
課程要求 |
Required readings; hands-on activities; participation; team work |
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
Office Hours |
備註: By appointment only. |
指定閱讀 |
Weekly Readings (subject to change)
[1] Myers, L. M. (1954). Linguistics and the Teaching of Rhetoric. College
Composition and Communication, 5(4), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/355432
[2] UNC Writing Center. “Paragraphs”
https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/paragraphs/.
[3] TUOS 301 Academic Skills Centre. “Academic Writing”
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/academic-skills/study-skills-online/academic-writing.
[4] Lutzke, J. & M.F. Henggeler. (2009). “The Rhetorical Triangle: Understanding
and Using Logos, Ethos, and Pathos” https://www.lsu.edu/hss/english/files/university_writing_files/item35402.pdf.
[5] Open Oregon Educational Resources. “Process Analysis” https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/oregonwrites/chapter/process-analysis/.
[6] EAP Foundation. “The Writing Process”
https://www.eapfoundation.com/writing/process/.
[7] Illinois Writers Workshop. “Conducting Peer Review”
https://writersworkshop.illinois.edu/resources-2/instructor-resources/conducting-peer-review/.
[8] UNC Writing Center. “Argument” from
https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/argument/.
[9] Brummett, B. (2016). “The Rhetoric of Style” https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.
0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-124.
|
參考書目 |
Raskin, V., & Weiser, I. (1987). Language and Writing: Applications of Linguistics of Rhetoric and Composition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. |
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
1. |
Participation |
20% |
Including students' participation and class exercises. |
2. |
Writing assignments |
30% |
Three reflective writing activities |
3. |
Midterm |
20% |
|
4. |
Final report |
30% |
Major project and related assignments |
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
2/21 |
[1] Linguistics and the teaching of rhetoric
Introduction |
第2週 |
2/28 |
Holiday |
第3週 |
03/07 |
[2] UNC
Writing and creativity |
第4週 |
03/14 |
[2] Paragraph
Paragraph writing |
第5週 |
03/21 |
[3] Academic writing
Academic writing |
第6週 |
03/28 |
[4] The rhetorical triangle
1. Rhetoric
2. The three appeals by Aristotle |
第7週 |
04/04 |
Holiday |
第8週 |
04/11 |
[5] Process analysis
1. Process analysis
2. Effective vs. awkward sentences |
第9週 |
04/18 |
[6] The writing process
1. Comparison & contrast
2. Passive sentences |
第10週 |
04/25 |
[7] Concluding peer review
Peer review |
第11週 |
05/02 |
Midterm |
第12週 |
05/09 |
[8] Argument
1. Argument
2. Simplicity
Project development: Outline and strategies |
第13週 |
05/16 |
[9] The rhetoric of style
1. Style
2. Organization Rubrics |
第14週 |
05/23 |
Writing |
第15週 |
05/30 |
Final presentation |
|